Skip to main content

Shoot ‘Em Up!- a kinda-sorta review


A post Matrix, post Children of Men, and pre John Wick movie that combines the best of all three worlds to give you a heady concoction style, glamour, action, and boobies.

Roger Ebert gave this movie 3.5/ 4.


“There once was a woman who was quite begat. 
She had three babies named Nat, Pat, and Tat. 
She said it was fun in the breeding, 
but found it was hell in the feeding 
when she saw there was no tit for Tat.”


 Shoot ‘Em Up is not for the purists- either of cinema or of action. It’s pure madness on celluloid in its truest form. It doesn’t have the emotional anchor of John Wick. It tries to, it really does, but it fails short because we just don’t really give a fuck about the protagonist. Not even when we learn why he turned into a brooding, man of serious demeanour (?)- supposedly supposed to make us care for his sad past.

Then there’s the style of the Matrix. It’s been done to death, especially in the time when this movie came out. But combine it with the brain thumping, eye hurting, saturated yellow hue that populates the screen. Revolutionary.

I just put in Children of Men because Clive Owen looks like he just dropped in from that set to finish this movie. 

Then there’s the tropes. God the tropes! 
  • Monica Bellucci as the “whore with the heart of gold”, and tits full of milk.
  • Clive Owen as the brooding, man-with-a-dark-past hero. Guess what his dark past is? Dead wife and child. Yup. He’s the basic bitch of 30’s film noir. A wannabe Humphrey Bogart, but with a semi automatic.
  • The snappy dialogue that is just witty enough to leave you slightly amused.


“Who are you Mr. Smith?”
“I’m British, and I’m dangerous.”


The only thing that deviates from this trope fest is, surprise surprise, the goddamn villain.

Paul Giamatti is an absolute delight to watch as an idiosyncratic mob boss with a penchant for filling up body bags with his own henchmen every time he’s on screen. He doesn’t give a rats ass while popping a cap in his own men. Neither do the remainder of his men. They don’t protest his obsessive and borderline insane behaviour. See, it’s these little discrepancies that keep the movie from being the perfect entertainer. 

Oh, and the scene where he calls for more men, because, you know, he’s kinda finished off half his men himself. Classic. And it’s the commitment to such little cause-and-effect moments is what makes this movie un-not-watchable.


“Do you know why a gun is better than a wife?”
“…”
“You can put a silencer on a gun.”


The plot is rather weak and the main leads have absolutely o chemistry. Hell, even Paul Giamatti and his wife (off screen. Never seen, never heard, we only hear of Pauls side of the conversation with her on the phone) have much better chemistry. 

Clive Owen looks eternally bored. 

Monica Bellucci is the Monalisa of our generation. She manages to look perpetually bored and caring at the same time in this movie. An amazing feat indeed.

The baby is cute. Smiles when you explain how a gun operates.



But fuck all that. Let’s talk action. You know John Wick and his pencil? Well, here, it’s Mr. Smith and his carrot. 

You know John Wick and his guns? Well, here, it’s Mr. Smith and his guns.

You know John Wick and his insanely choreographed dance of death? Well, that’s not here. It’s all wham-bam-thank you mam. 


Over all it’s the ethos of a B movie marrying the production values of a Hollywood blockbuster. And it’s done just right. So, when you’re watching Shoot ‘Em Up, you better strap in and brace yourself for a bumpy, crazy fuckin ride. Because it is one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peter Principle and the (Middle) Managerial Trap

If you are in any managerial position (thanks to promotions) and this is the first time you’re hearing of the Peter Principle, then you are already a lost cause.  Close this tab and go back to scrolling Instagram reels. Bye-bye. According to Wikipedia (remember that old relic, before ChatGPT became the de facto encyclopedia? Remember encyclopedia? Never mind). According to Wikipedia, the Peter Principle “observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to 'a level of respective incompetence’”, which means your promotions are based on how good you are at your current role. You continue to rise the rungs of corporate till you reach a position where you, and you will, suck at your job. At some point in your career, you will end up rotting away at a level you are least competent at; some place where you barely scrape by, unsure of where you’re faltering because the barometer for quality is hidden behind a thick veil of your own incompetence. Hence, the burnout.  And the desperate ...

Clubhouse. CoWin. China.

If you feel an odd sense of deja vu while reading this piece, then you've spent too much time switching between Facebook and Clubhouse. Unless you've been living underground or in a home with ACT broadband, you know what Clubhouse is - it is where many people can have their Mann ki Baat at once. And Facebook has turned into a platform to critique, analyse and make fun of discussions that happen on Clubouse. Congrats Clubhouse, you just replaced the Indian Government, at least as far as Facebook discourses go. Clubhouse is more or less an impulsive, live podcast session - an open space where everyone is made to feel like Joe Rogan. But no one talks about DMT or shaved gorillas or MMA or shaved gorillas doing MMA while on DMT. But it always does sound like everyone is on something stronger than the devil's lettuce. Maybe you need that to hear your own thoughts over the din of uncomprehensive ramblings and mouth-breathing noises. Speaking of noises, Saudi Arabia restricted the...

Bharatipura: The Curious Case of the Solo Social Reformer

  Set against the backdrop of a caste-ridden society, Bharatipura delves into the idealism of Jagannatha, a man whose philosophy is as well-intentioned as it is misguided. Having recently returned from England, he attempts to apply Western models of social justice to his village's deeply entrenched caste system. He is aware of the struggles of communities like the Black population in the West and wants to initiate similar change for the Holeyaru, the community of manual scavengers. Jagannatha's efforts are futile because he fails to grasp how social movements gain momentum. While he aims to lead a strong agitation, he discovers he is a lone crusader. The novel expertly highlights how the injustice of the caste system has been internalized by both the upper castes and the Dalits, with neither group showing a true willingness to change. His well-intentioned initiatives fail because the very people he seeks to uplift are not prepared to embrace his cause. This resistance is rooted...