Skip to main content

The Meaninglessness of Life and Other Cock ‘n Bull Stories

 The act of smoking (or smoking up) is a sacred ritual. Dating back to ye ‘ol times of yore, it involved an old man, probably senile, and definitely hairy on the wrong side of the head, transforming crushed dried leaves and herbs into a portable-apparition device by the simple act of lighting it up and inhaling the white fumes. Puff-puff-pass was probably a thing back then too, definitely.

Air, fire and earth – the holy trinity of existential liberation in just the right proportion seems to free your mind in soul[1]. When in actuality, it chokes your lungs and wreaks havoc on… well, pretty much every other part of your body. But goddamn does it feel so good to breathe in that toxic smoke.

Maybe that’s why the first drag of the dirty nicotine stick every morning feels so special. That DNA-altering carcinogenic smoke tickles something so primordial, it wakes up the dormant gene that once resided in the (organic) tar-filled lungs of your great250-grandfather[2]. Like a near-dead addict reaching out for the one final hit before crossing the rainbow bridge. Probably only to be killed by the toxic smoke.

 

“Find what you love and let it kill you”

                                                                                                    – Charles Bukowski.

 

 

But that doesn’t really matter. What matters is the illusion - the maya, the abracadabra. Smoking after all is an escape – or a futile attempt - to escape the absurdity of life by weirdly inching closer to death. The sexy cancer stick, in a poetic way, essays how death is the ultimate liberation from all our suffering and happiness. Basically nothing matters, except – no exceptions!

Smokers are unsuspecting, unwilling philosophers. More like Diogenes and less like Ayn Rand – who live by their own twisted principles instead of preaching it. Also they don’t know what they’re philosiphising (is that a word? It is now). How do you explain to someone who doesn’t smoke that the first cigarette of the day feels like heaven and the 10th feels like you’re the cigarette’s bitch.

Every smoker knows cigarettes are bad. Neither the constant reminders of Mukesh and Sunita before every movie (makes you crave a smoke, really, those ads DO NOT serve their purpose), nor do the cancerous lungs on every pack deter a smoker. And not even a determined smoker. Even the ones who “only smoke when I drink” or those who “smoke once in a while, sometimes, when I’m stressed”.

In sickness and in health. In stress and in leisure. With chai and with rum. A cigarette is that constant companion whom you love to hate and hate to love.

But the cigarette? It’s built to kill.

 

 

Alt-paragraphs (to be read after the citation thingie)

[1] Put it in a hookah and you have the holy quaternity – air, fire, earth and water. Put a hookah in the hands of a troubled artist and you have the holy Captain Planet – earth, fire, wind, water and heart.

[2] The earliest evidence of smoking tobacco was in 5000 BC. Writing was invented around 3400 BC. Which means for over 1500 years, all paper was rolling paper.

P.S: I’m not an idiot, this just makes for a funny… fact

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peter Principle and the (Middle) Managerial Trap

If you are in any managerial position (thanks to promotions) and this is the first time you’re hearing of the Peter Principle, then you are already a lost cause.  Close this tab and go back to scrolling Instagram reels. Bye-bye. According to Wikipedia (remember that old relic, before ChatGPT became the de facto encyclopedia? Remember encyclopedia? Never mind). According to Wikipedia, the Peter Principle “observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to 'a level of respective incompetence’”, which means your promotions are based on how good you are at your current role. You continue to rise the rungs of corporate till you reach a position where you, and you will, suck at your job. At some point in your career, you will end up rotting away at a level you are least competent at; some place where you barely scrape by, unsure of where you’re faltering because the barometer for quality is hidden behind a thick veil of your own incompetence. Hence, the burnout.  And the desperate ...

Clubhouse. CoWin. China.

If you feel an odd sense of deja vu while reading this piece, then you've spent too much time switching between Facebook and Clubhouse. Unless you've been living underground or in a home with ACT broadband, you know what Clubhouse is - it is where many people can have their Mann ki Baat at once. And Facebook has turned into a platform to critique, analyse and make fun of discussions that happen on Clubouse. Congrats Clubhouse, you just replaced the Indian Government, at least as far as Facebook discourses go. Clubhouse is more or less an impulsive, live podcast session - an open space where everyone is made to feel like Joe Rogan. But no one talks about DMT or shaved gorillas or MMA or shaved gorillas doing MMA while on DMT. But it always does sound like everyone is on something stronger than the devil's lettuce. Maybe you need that to hear your own thoughts over the din of uncomprehensive ramblings and mouth-breathing noises. Speaking of noises, Saudi Arabia restricted the...

Bharatipura: The Curious Case of the Solo Social Reformer

  Set against the backdrop of a caste-ridden society, Bharatipura delves into the idealism of Jagannatha, a man whose philosophy is as well-intentioned as it is misguided. Having recently returned from England, he attempts to apply Western models of social justice to his village's deeply entrenched caste system. He is aware of the struggles of communities like the Black population in the West and wants to initiate similar change for the Holeyaru, the community of manual scavengers. Jagannatha's efforts are futile because he fails to grasp how social movements gain momentum. While he aims to lead a strong agitation, he discovers he is a lone crusader. The novel expertly highlights how the injustice of the caste system has been internalized by both the upper castes and the Dalits, with neither group showing a true willingness to change. His well-intentioned initiatives fail because the very people he seeks to uplift are not prepared to embrace his cause. This resistance is rooted...